| Editor’s note:
			The European Directive has generated 
			much discussion throughout the MRI community globally. SMRT Policy 
			Board Member and Publications Committee Chair, John Totman, 
			shares his view of the directive from the MR Technologists 
			perspective. The European Physical Agents (Electromagnetic Fields) Directive 
			applies to occupational exposure to electromagnetic fields (not 
			clinical exposure) and was intended to limit workers’ acute exposure 
			to strong electromagnetic fields, as may be found near electricity 
			substations, radio or television transmitters or industrial 
			equipment. However, the regulations impact significantly on MRI, if 
			enforced the use of MRI might be restricted and working practices 
			would need to be changed.
 
 Editor’s note: 
			The following update of the European Directive is 
			written by Stephen Keevil, Ph.D., who 
			represents the UK MRI community in discussions with the UK 
			government and the European Commission about safety and regulatory 
			issues. Dr. Keevil is currently Consultant Physicist, Head of 
			Magnetic Resonance Physics and Research and Development Lead for 
			Imaging at Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust and Reader in 
			Medical Physics at King’s College London. He is also joint Director 
			of the NICE External Assessment Centre for Imaging Technologies. He 
			is a member of the safety committees of both the International 
			Society for MR in Medicine (ISMRM) and the European Society for 
			Magnetic Resonance in Medicine and Biology (ESMRMB). He is President 
			Elect of the Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine (IPEM) 
			and also President of the United Kingdom Radiological Congress (UKRC) 
			for 2012-13.
 
 The situation with the European Directive can be summarised as 
			follows.
 
 In April 2008, the European Parliament and Council agreed to delay 
			implementation of the EMF Directive (2004/40/EC) for two years, 
			until the end of April 2012, because of the possible impact on MRI 
			clinical practice and research. A lengthy period of impact 
			assessment and consultation with stakeholders followed, including 
			detailed and very constructive discussions with the MRI community.
 
 In June 2011, the Commission proposed a new Directive, in which MRI 
			would be removed from the exposure limits and worker safety 
			addressed instead through Europe-wide guidelines on safe working and 
			training requirements. This proposal requires agreement from the 
			European Parliament and Council before it can be adopted. 
			Unfortunately there has been considerable resistance, particularly 
			in the Council, which is made up of representatives of EU 
			member-state governments. Some members’ states are opposed in 
			principle to removing one occupational sector from the exposure 
			limits, and others are not happy that the proposed safe working 
			guidelines have yet to be written. The Commission has therefore 
			proposed a further delay, which is itself currently being considered 
			by the Parliament and Council and is likely to result in an 
			additional 18-24 months in which to resolve the problem. Further 
			details and regular updates can be found at
 http://www.alliance-for-mri.org/cms/website.php?id=/en/eu_affairs_research/alliance_for_mri/alliance_for_mri_-_news.htm.
 |