Dharmesh Singh1, Saumya Diwan2, Virendra Kumar3, Chandan J Das4, Anup Singh1,5, and Amit Mehndiratta1,5
1Centre for Biomedical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Delhi, New Delhi, India, 2Delhi Technological University, Delhi, India, 3Department of NMR, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Delhi, New Delhi, India, 4Department of Radiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Delhi, New Delhi, India, 5Department of Biomedical Engineering, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Delhi, New Delhi, India
1Centre for Biomedical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Delhi, New Delhi, India, 2Delhi Technological University, Delhi, India, 3Department of NMR, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Delhi, New Delhi, India, 4Department of Radiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Delhi, New Delhi, India, 5Department of Biomedical Engineering, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Delhi, New Delhi, India
- 2D and 3D tumor estimation methods are developed for PI-RADS v2 assessment of prostate-cancer. 2D ellipse-fitting approach showed good agreement with radiologist assessment. 3D tumor-estimation can provide complimentary information to clinicians,which needs further investigation.
Figure 1: A framework of the proposed methods of tumor estimation
for PI-RADS v2 assessment
Figure
2: Representative
patient (58years); (A) Segmented
prostate gland, (B) Tumor marking in peripheral zone (PZ) with the help of radiologist, (C)
Tumor-estimation methods: (i) Radiologist
measurements using ImageJ software, (ii)
Ellipse-fitting, and (iii) Ellipsoid-fitting
