0247
Susceptibility artifact correction in MR thermometry for monitoring of mild RF hyperthermia using total field inversion
Christof Boehm1, Marianne Goeger-Neff2, Hendrik T. Mulder3, Benjamin Zilles2, Lars H. Lindner2, Gerard C. van Rhoon3, Dimitrios C. Karampinos4, and Mingming Wu1
1Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany, 2Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany, 3Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands, 4Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany

MR thermometry monitoring of mild RF hyperthermia of tumors in the pelvis and the upper leg are hampered by susceptibility artefacts. Novel methods from quantitative susceptibility mapping such as total field inversion resolve susceptibility artefacts while preserving temperature.

Figure 4: Resulting temperature maps for a cervical cancer patient during mild RF-HT of the tumor. Particularly for tumors close to the intestines, gas motion causes severe artifacts. The black arrows point at residual phase errors after background field correction, that appears to be less in the TFI. Furthermore, the LBV method resulted in the loss of valuable pixels. The comparison of the corrected temperature with a sensor illustrates how severe the susceptibility artifacts were in the uncorrected DEGRE.
Figure 3: Bowel motion-induced susceptibility artefacts in volunteers at constant temperature and their correction with LBV, PDF and TFI. The temperature error maps before and after correction are displayed. In the cumulative error plots, the ratio is calculated between the numbers of voxels occupying the given value and less over all voxel counts. In contrast to the simulation results, as seen in Fig.1, the cumulative error plots (last row) indicate that TFI results in the least residual phase errors.