1700
Birth weight is associated with brain tissue volumes seven decades later but not age-associated changes to brain structure
Emily Wheater1, Susan D Shenkin2,3, Susana Muñoz Maniega2,4, Maria Valdés Hernández2,4, Joanna M Wardlaw2,4, Ian J Deary4,5, Mark E Bastin2,4,6, James P Boardman1,2, and Simon R Cox4,5,6
1Centre for Reproductive Health, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom, 2Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom, 3Geriatric Medicine, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom, 4Lothian Birth Cohorts, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom, 5Psychology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom, 6Scottish Imaging Network, A Platform for Scientific Excellence Collaboration (SINAPSE), Edinburgh, United Kingdom
Birth weight is positively associated with brain tissue volumes at age 73 but not age-associated brain features. Effect of birth weight on brain volumes is independent of overall body size and is likely to confer brain tissue reserve in later life. 
Figure 1. Regional distribution of associations between birth weight and cortical surface area: A) adjusted for sex and age; B) adjusted for age, sex, height and weight; C) adjusted for age, sex, and ICV. T maps (left); FDR q values (middle), far right (B and C) shows the percentage attenuation between the model shown in A, and the additionally adjusted models shown in B and C.
Table 1. Associations between birth weight and global brain structure at age 73. Standardised regression coefficients between birth weight and volumetric/white matter microstructure MRI measures in models adjusted for: sex and age at MRI; sex, age at MRI, height and weight; sex, age at MRI and ICV; and sex, age at MRI, ICV (intracranial volume), height and weight. Bold typeface denotes FDR q < 0.05.