1961
Influence of training data on RAKI reconstruction quality in standard 2D imaging
Peter Dawood1,2, Martin Blaimer3, Peter M. Jakob1, and Johannes Oberberger2
1Department of Experimental Physics 5, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany, 2Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany, 3Magnetic Resonance and X-Ray Imaging Department, Development Center X-ray Technology EZRT, Fraunhofer Institute for Integrated Circuits IIS, Würzburg, Germany
Compared to standard parallel imaging, deep-learning based RAKI yields superior signal-to-noise ratio but introduces blurring at high accelerations. The contrast in the calibration data should be similar to that of the accelerated scans.

Fig. 1: The CNN architecture used in this work. The input layer takes in the subsampled, zerofilled k-space data of the coil array with Nc independent choils. Real- and imaginary part of the k-space data are passed to separate channels, resulting in 2 x Nc input-channels. Two hidden layers are assigned 256 and 128 channels, respectively (n2=256 and n3=128). The output layer predicts all missing points across all coils simultaneously, and thus has 2 x (R-1) x Nc channels, with R denoting the undersampling rate.

Fig. 2: 2D image reconstructions of brain dataset (32 coils, T1-weighted) for retrospective undersampling rates in range 4-6 (denoted as R4-R6). ACS data (30 central phase lines) were re-inserted into reconstructed k-spaces. GRAPPA kernel size was optimized for each undersampling rate: 11 x 4 (R4-5), and 15 x 2 (R6) in read- and phase direction. RAKI performs better than GRAPPA in terms of noise resilience, but suffers from blurring artifacts, which have pronounced appearance at 6-fold undersampling.