2479
Electric Field Calculation and PNS Prediction for Head and Body Gradient Coils
Koray Ertan1,2, Trevor Wade3,4, Andrew Alejski4, Charles A McKenzie3, Paolo Decuzzi2, Brian Rutt1, and Peter B Roemer5
1Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States, 2Laboratory of Nanotechnology for Precision Medicine, Italian Institute of Technology, Genoa, Italy, 3Department of Medical Biophysics, Western University, London, ON, Canada, 4Robarts Research Institute, Western University, London, ON, Canada, 5Roemer Consulting, Lutz, FL, United States
Our new methods allowed calculation of E-field distributions on realistically sized body models with uniform interior; these were then used to predict population-mean PNS thresholds for widely different gradient coils with high accuracy. These new tools enable PNS-optimal gradient design.
Figure 3: Measured and calculated PNS thresholds as well as hardware limits for seven gradient directions of H3, shoulder-coil contact body position. Individual PNS threshold measurements are shown using open markers. Logistic regression mean experimental PNS values are shown with solid (filled) markers and error bars. Linear fit to measured PNS thresholds are shown as solid lines. Hardware limits are shown as dashed lines. Calculated PNS thresholds shown as dotted lines. Chronaxie value of 600 µs was used for the head gradient calculations. Vertical axes represent peak to peak ΔG.
Figure 2: Calculated E-fields per unit slew rate on the surface of 50th percentile male body model for (a) asymmetric GE head gradient, (b) symmetric H3 head gradient (in contact with shoulder) and 40 x 20 cm elliptical cylinder for (c) BRM body gradient coil. E-field directions and peak E-field value are shown. Only negative Z coordinates for BRM coil are shown due to symmetry. Peak E-fields occur at the face and top of the head for X and Y gradients of the asymmetric GE coil, R/L side of the neck and shoulder region for the Y gradient of H3 and R/L side of the torso for the BRM coil.